Published on September 28, 2016
The FBI refuses to act against Hillary Clinton and her corruption.
Video Transcript: This investigation started because the Inspector General found classified information on secure setting and the FBI went to a law firm and found this information they seized at least one computer at least one thumb drive did you need an immunity agreement to get those it was not i don't think there was a mutant fact I'm certain there was no immunity agreement used in connection with that so did it really take the FBI a full year to figure out that Cheryl Mills and other Samson also had computers with classified information no it took us to that . investigation to insist that we try to get them are you getting that because they had classified information or because there were some other information you want we thought those with the tools we understood that have been used to sort the emails and investigative team very much want to understand if they could weather was an electronic well of how that had been done big big issue was what did they delete what did they keep in but why did you need an immunity agreement why didn't they just cooperate and hand them over a law firm did didn't he oh yes the that's a question really I can't answer that's between a lawyer and her client and the Justice Department lawyers for whatever reason her lawyer thought it was in her interest to get an active production immunity agreement with the Department Justice the FBI interviewed David Kendall's partner but did not interview David Kendall why didn't you interview David Kendall I don't remember I don't remember that decision going back to this reddit post this is put up on july twenty fourth of 2014 you believe this to be associated with mr. competi correct yes think that's right um this is the one to mr. Jordan put up about the need to strip out of VIPs very VIP email address and a bunch of archived email this is if he's that referring to a federal record isn't he I don't know exactly which records is referring to how is this not a conscious effort to alter federal records I mean the proximity to the date is it just stunning sorry what's the question how is this not a conscious effort to do to alter federal record depending on what the record was exactly what he was trying to do and whether there would be disclosure to the people they were producing a to saying we change this for public for privacy purposes just don't know sitting here these are documents that were under subpoena these federal records are under subpoena their honor under a preservation order did mr. combated destroy documents i don't know where that was true in july of 2014 they're under subpoena did he ultimately destroy federal records mr. competitor oh I have no reasonably be destroyed federal records use bleach bit did he not have the question is what was already produced before use the bleach bit he definitely the reason he wanted immunity was he had done the bleach bit business after it was publicity about the demand from Congress for the records that's a potential not just Felicity there's a subpoena right that's pretend there was communication from Cheryl Mills that there was a preservation order correct yes and he did indeed use bleach bit on these records sure whether or not that's why the guy wouldn't talk to us without immunity it's so when you got immunity what did you learn we learned that no one had directed him to do that but he had done it if you strip you really think that he just did this by himself I think his account again I don't I never firmly believe anybody except my my wife but it but the question is do I have evidence to disbelieve him and I don't his account is credible he was told to do it in 2014 screwed up and didn't do it panicked when he realized he hadn't in the race back in and did it after Congress as for the records and the new york times wrote about them that was his oh shi t moment but that was incredible again I don't believe people but we did not have evidence to disbelieve that established someone told him to do that no email no phone call nothing the hope was if you've been told to do that that'd be a great piece of evidence if we give him immunity maybe he'll tell us so and so told me to so-and-so asked me to and then we're working up the chain but he did indeed destroy federal records and he was told at some point to do this correct who told him to do that initially when we supposed to do it in december and he didn't do it who told him to do that one of one of Secretary Clinton staff members me i can remember sitting here we know that one of her lawyers might have been Cheryl Mills someone on the team said we don't need those emails anymore get rid of the archive file this is that's unbelievable about this because there's classified information there is there are federal records that were indeed destroyed and that's up that's just the fact batter let's go back to let's go back to this here's the other thing that's a draw to your attention that is new September fifteenth of this year I issued a subpoena from the Oversight and Government Reform Committee on these reddit post four days later they were just they were destroyed or taken down they were deleted I would hope the FBI would take that into consideration again we're trying under a properly issued subpoena to get to this information go to heather mills real quick how does the in the 2016 interview with Cheryl Mills she says quote mills did not learn in the interview report that you the interviews summary from the FBI mills did not learn Clinton it was using a private email server until after Clinton's tenure back yet also you have this interview with mr. pagliaro who said he approached quote peg landing approach Cheryl Mills in her office and related a State Department employees concerns regarding federal records retention and the use of a private server pagliaro remembers mills replying that former secretaries of state had done similar things to include colin powell it goes then onto a page 10 and this is what i don't understand the FBI rights Clinton's immediate aids to include mills Aventine Sullivan and read a redacted name told the FBI they were unaware of the existence of a private server until after click Clinton's tenure and state or when it became public knowledge but if you look back at the email from from heather mills if you go back to 2010 this is to Justin Cooper k mills to Cooper who does not which you where he works for Clinton's he doesn't work for the state department FYI hrc email coming back is server okay Cooper writes back you are funny we're on the same server she knew there was a server when there was a problem with Hillary Rodham Clinton's emails what did they do she called the person who has no background in this is not a State Department employee no security clearance and then tells the FBI well I'd ever knew about that but there's direct evidence that contradicts this how do you come to that conclusion write that in the summary statement that she had no knowledge of this there was a problem with Hillary Rodham Clinton's emails what did they do she called the person who has no background in this is not a State Department employee no security clearance and then tells the FBI well I'd ever knew about that but there's direct evidence that contradicts this how do you come to that conclusion write that in the summary statement that she had no knowledge of this
Source: Scott Anthony YouTube Channel
Fair Use Disclaimer for News Broadcasting: The Content in this is believed to be video that constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. This channel is making such material available in a effort to advance the understanding of the following, including but not limited to: environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment